Centres Of Excellence

To focus on new and emerging areas of research and education, Centres of Excellence have been established within the Institute. These ‘virtual' centres draw on resources from its stakeholders, and interact with them to enhance core competencies

Read More >>

Faculty

Faculty members at IIMB generate knowledge through cutting-edge research in all functional areas of management that would benefit public and private sector companies, and government and society in general.

Read More >>

IIMB Management Review

Journal of Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

IIM Bangalore offers Degree-Granting Programmes, a Diploma Programme, Certificate Programmes and Executive Education Programmes and specialised courses in areas such as entrepreneurship and public policy.

Read More >>

About IIMB

The Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB) believes in building leaders through holistic, transformative and innovative education

Read More >>

Twisted Logic of Patenting Life and DNA

Volume 16, Number 2 Article by Pavan Mamidi and Pramod Reddy June, 2004

Twisted Logic of Patenting Life and DNA - Lessons from American Precedents :

With the US directly or indirectly setting standards for the rest of the world in the patenting of life and DNA, Pavan Mamidi and Pramod Reddy explore the shortcomings in American patent policy and propose a re-examination of patenting criteria and institutional arrangements that impact technological choices. They hope to instruct policy making in the rest of the world in terms of what not to copy from the Americans.

By questioning the purpose of intellectual property, the authors aver that extending proprietary interests over certain items is not contingent upon considerations of technical expediency alone and, contrary to the existing paradigm in IP thinking in the US, historical experience, reasonableness, economic efficiency, broader policy criteria and political contingency also must be given due consideration.

Coming to the actual criteria of patentability, in addition to 'novelty' and 'utility', the criterion of 'non-obviousness' was introduced to qualify novelty with the condition of 'non-triviality' or 'technical accomplishment'. This is undertaken by the 'Phosita' ('person having ordinary skill in the art') questioning process where the courts make an appeal as to whether this fictitious artisan would have anticipated the given technical idea or not.

Mamidi and Reddy question the adequacy of the 'Phosita' method, and suggest a methodology to evaluate and think about patentability criteria while retaining its sensitivity to policy aims. Examining agency relationships formed between decision making institutions such as the US Patents Office and the courts in the light of decisions regarding the patenting of genetic material, the authors highlight the mismatch between control and competence and urge that we pay attention to how we structure our institutional arrangements so as to avoid the risk of incompetent entities making bad choices.

Reprint No 04205c