IIMB Management Review

Journal of Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation

Anand Venkateswaran and Tiantian Gu
Journal Name
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Journal Publication
others
Publication Year
2018
Journal Publications Functional Area
Finance & Accounting
Publication Date
Vol. 51, Issue 3, October 2018, Pg. 621-649
Abstract

In this paper we examine customer firms’ managerial compensation policies when they have important supplier relations. We show that firms with greater reliance on their suppliers tend to offer higher total- and equity-based pay but lower risking-taking incentives to its top executives. Our results are consistent with the argument that suppliers making firm-specific investments are concerned about the customer firm’s prospects. Therefore, firms with important supplier relations use the compensation policies of their top executives (more equity-based and less risk-taking) to signal their commitment to a stable and promising performance in the future. To address endogeneity issues arising out of time-varying omitted variables, we exploit a 2SLS procedure to supplement our baseline OLS findings. Our results are robust alternate measures of suppliers’ relationship-specific investments and econometric models. Overall, our results indicate that some of the heterogeneity in managerial compensation can be attributed to characteristics of the firm’s supply-chain relations.

Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation

Author(s) Name: Anand Venkateswaran and Tiantian Gu
Journal Name: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume: Vol. 51, Issue 3, October 2018, Pg. 621-649
Year of Publication: 2018
Abstract:

In this paper we examine customer firms’ managerial compensation policies when they have important supplier relations. We show that firms with greater reliance on their suppliers tend to offer higher total- and equity-based pay but lower risking-taking incentives to its top executives. Our results are consistent with the argument that suppliers making firm-specific investments are concerned about the customer firm’s prospects. Therefore, firms with important supplier relations use the compensation policies of their top executives (more equity-based and less risk-taking) to signal their commitment to a stable and promising performance in the future. To address endogeneity issues arising out of time-varying omitted variables, we exploit a 2SLS procedure to supplement our baseline OLS findings. Our results are robust alternate measures of suppliers’ relationship-specific investments and econometric models. Overall, our results indicate that some of the heterogeneity in managerial compensation can be attributed to characteristics of the firm’s supply-chain relations.