Centres Of Excellence

To focus on new and emerging areas of research and education, Centres of Excellence have been established within the Institute. These ‘virtual' centres draw on resources from its stakeholders, and interact with them to enhance core competencies

Read More >>

Faculty

Faculty members at IIMB generate knowledge through cutting-edge research in all functional areas of management that would benefit public and private sector companies, and government and society in general.

Read More >>

IIMB Management Review

Journal of Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

IIM Bangalore offers Degree-Granting Programmes, a Diploma Programme, Certificate Programmes and Executive Education Programmes and specialised courses in areas such as entrepreneurship and public policy.

Read More >>

About IIMB

The Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB) believes in building leaders through holistic, transformative and innovative education

Read More >>

To earmark or not to earmark when gift-giving: Gift-givers’ and gift-recipients’ diverging preferences for earmarked cash gifts

Julian Givi and Gopal Das
Journal Name
Psychology & Marketing
Journal Publication
others
Publication Year
2022
Journal Publications Functional Area
Marketing
Publication Date
Vol. 39(2), February 2022, Pg. 420-428
Abstract

Much research has shed light on the what to give facet of gift-giving; that is, which types of products should consumers give as gifts? However, little research has investigated the how to give component of gift-giving; that is, holding the gift itself constant, how should it be given? In the present work, we explore the messaging aspect of how to give, thereby expanding the gift-giving literature. Specifically, we investigate gift-givers' and gift-recipients' preferences regarding the practice of earmarking cash gifts (i.e., suggesting that a cash gift be used on a particular product). Across multiple studies, we demonstrate that givers are less likely to earmark cash gifts than recipients prefer, because givers view earmarking as less thoughtful compared to recipients. Moreover, consistent with a thoughtfulness account, we show that givers are more likely to earmark in situations where they view earmarking as thoughtful. We conclude by discussing how our work offers a unique contribution to the gift-giving literature (as it is the first to document a giver-recipient asymmetry involving how to give), suggests that givers should earmark cash gifts more often, and clears many paths for future research (on other potential giver-recipient asymmetries tied to how to give).

To earmark or not to earmark when gift-giving: Gift-givers’ and gift-recipients’ diverging preferences for earmarked cash gifts

Author(s) Name: Julian Givi and Gopal Das
Journal Name: Psychology & Marketing
Volume: Vol. 39(2), February 2022, Pg. 420-428
Year of Publication: 2022
Abstract:

Much research has shed light on the what to give facet of gift-giving; that is, which types of products should consumers give as gifts? However, little research has investigated the how to give component of gift-giving; that is, holding the gift itself constant, how should it be given? In the present work, we explore the messaging aspect of how to give, thereby expanding the gift-giving literature. Specifically, we investigate gift-givers' and gift-recipients' preferences regarding the practice of earmarking cash gifts (i.e., suggesting that a cash gift be used on a particular product). Across multiple studies, we demonstrate that givers are less likely to earmark cash gifts than recipients prefer, because givers view earmarking as less thoughtful compared to recipients. Moreover, consistent with a thoughtfulness account, we show that givers are more likely to earmark in situations where they view earmarking as thoughtful. We conclude by discussing how our work offers a unique contribution to the gift-giving literature (as it is the first to document a giver-recipient asymmetry involving how to give), suggests that givers should earmark cash gifts more often, and clears many paths for future research (on other potential giver-recipient asymmetries tied to how to give).